Medicinal plants are useful. Indeed, many modern drugs have been derived from plants.
However, there is far too much quackery in herbal medicine. Far too many rogues. Far too many “scientists” with dubious PhD degrees from cut-rate institutes. Far too many self-styled experts.
Here’s how the quacks and the “scientists” will con you:
1) “It’s herbal. No side-effects”.
Bullshit. This is an utter lie. If any herbalist tells you this, no matter how many PhD degrees he has, please run. Run far and run fast. Only a genuine quack would make this claim. The belief that herbs do not have side-effects is the most common and most dangerous myth out there.
Reality check: Most plants are toxic to humans. Very few of them are edible, and very very few of them are useful as medicines. By “useful” one does not mean that these few herbs are harmless. Far from it. There is no such thing as a safe herb. Doesn’t exist.
2) “It’s time-tested, over centuries, over thousands of years, used by millions of people. Do you think millions of people across the world are fools”?
Just because a herb has been used by millions of people over thousands of years, that still does not mean that the stuff is safe.
As an example, here’s a very popular herb that has been in use since 6000 BC. It has been in continuous use since eight thousand years. WHO says that across the world, one billion people consume it several times a day, every single day. That’s one-seventh of the world’s population. The herb provides a living to millions of farmers world-wide. Trans-national corporations have built their multi-billion dollar empires because of it. Wars have been fought over it.
How can such a herb be anything but safe and useful? Do you think that one billion people across the world are fools? The answer is YES. Because the herb we are talking about is TOBACCO.
See what I mean?
3) “It’s guaranteed”.
Of course it’s guaranteed. So is a visit to the hospital.
“Guaranteed” is not a scientific term. You will not find the word “guaranteed” in any peer-reviewed scientific publication. This word is specifically used by door-to-door salesmen, by street-side peddlers, by snake-oil merchants, by smooth talkers in expensive suits with MBA degrees hanging on their walls – and by certain “scientists”.
If the herb has been studied by real scientists using accepted methods of science, written about in research papers that have been critiqued by other scientists, and then approved for use by national-level regulatory agencies, there would no need to “guarantee” its safety and efficacy.
4) “It’s a gift to mankind from Mother Nature and/or God. How dare you question Mother Nature and/or God? What are you, an atheist?”
I love this argument. Herbalists and “scientists” throw these phrases at me all the time. As if it is blasphemy to use one’s common sense.
Plants, like all other life-forms, have evolved over a few billion years into what they are today. Do you really think they exist for your sole benefit? Plants produce phytochemicals for their own use, for their own survival, for their own metabolism needs. Not for you. Any effect those phytochemicals may have on your body is totally co-incidental.
Do you really think any plant on this earth cares about your diabetes or blood pressure or your cholesterol or your dysfunctional dick? Plants do not get diabetes. Why would any plant produce phytochemicals to treat your diabetes, then? Ever thought about that?
As I said, these effects on your body are entirely co-incidental. Be thankful for that co-incidence. But don’t believe everything you hear or read. Be thoroughly skeptical.
5) “Several published studies have proven that…”, “The latest research shows that …”
This is a dangerous trap, that deceives even qualified people. It’s called Argument from Authority. To quote Wikipedia, this is a “logical fallacy that argues that a position is true or more likely to be true because an authority or authorities agree with it”.
What it means in simple terms is that people will believe anything they hear from someone who looks like an authority. And this is exactly where the catch is. How do you know that the quoted authority is really an authority? How do you know the scientific journal that published that research study is in fact a reputable journal? How do you know the research study is itself not a total fake?
A large number of research papers published from India are either outright fakes or riddled with dubious data, erroneous results and unreliable conclusions. Many “reputable” journals are published by semi-literate nitwits operating out of their homes. Any body with a PC and an internet connection can create a scientific journal with an impressive name. Mind you, anybody.
Forty two percent of the world’s fake scientific journals originate from India. Did you know that?
If I were to tell you that my research study was published in The International Journal of Advanced Herbal Medicine and Plant Science, you would be suitably impressed. Except that this journal does not exist. I thought it up just now.
The real question you should be asking is, who sponsored that research study? If a research study on a herbal product is sponsored by the manufacturer himself, do you really think it will be totally honest and unbiased? Really?
6) “That eminent scientist and his fellow eminent scientists have set up an international research foundation for this herb. Do you mean to say those eminent scientists are liars”?
Yes, sometimes they are.
Adolf Hitler recruited one hundred physicists, including Nobel laureates, to write a book refuting Einstein’s theory of relativity. Einstein’s only response to that book was, “Why one hundred? If I am wrong, just one would have been enough”.
Just because a whole bunch of “scientists” gets together and says the same thing, it does not always mean they are correct – or telling the truth. Many such research foundations that have been set up by such “scientists” are sponsored by companies with a strong profit motive.
In fact, the more the number of “eminent” scientists involved in a research foundation, the more skeptical you should be about what they’re telling you.
7) “No need for “allopathic” medicines. They are poisonous chemicals. Stop all chemicals, and use only my herbs”.
Yeah sure. Please write up your will before you do that. Phytochemicals are chemicals too. And they are just as toxic as any other chemical, if not more.
Get this into your head. Pharmaceutical companies make drugs specifically for you, designed for your ailments, tested for you, certified as safe for you. And they spend millions of dollars and many many years to bring those life-saving medicines to you.
Plants do not produce phytochemicals for you. They don’t care about you and your multiple ailments. They do not even know you exist.
Got the picture?
As I said before, a few herbs found in nature are certainly useful. Only very few of them. If you do want to use herbs for your health, please do so. But talk to the right people, get your facts right, and use your own judgement.
Do not ever take herbal remedies along with your regular medicine. Ever. Even a simple condiment like turmeric interferes with many life-saving drugs.
And do not ever, ever stop taking your regular medicine, without talking to a real doctor first.
Mother Nature has not made plants for your exclusive benefit.
Mother Nature, however, has definitely given you something for your exclusive benefit. It’s called a brain. Use it.
Cheers … Srini.